Tuesday, November 9, 2010
The "Little Bang"?
It's a great moment for them, no doubt, especially considering how much work it has been to make this atom smasher, so much larger and more powerful than any of its predecessors. And they had to stay with the project after it broke down in initial trials. But genius and hard work can accomplish a lot.
But now, hold on... this experiment was entirely the result of years of planning and human invention, carefully staged and executed in a machine that boggles the ordinary mind for its complexity. And its result produced this "mini big bang", to illustrate, they say, an event that took place billions of years ago to form the materials of our universe, from which all matter, living and non-living, got its start.
But "they" also say the original "Bang" happened as a result of natural forces, not being directed by any intelligent or creative Being. It just happened, and now it took an immense army of scientists, technicians, inventors, and workers of all kinds (not to mention money) to make a teensie little example of what "just happened"?
Are these scientists too blinded by their humanistic, rational beliefs that they can't see the obvious? If there was such a beginning to our universe, surely it couldn't require less intelligence to produce something infinitely greater than a "mini bang" that required a human intelligence and effort that was itself the result of centuries of human learning and experimentation. I can only agree with what the apostle Paul said of such men, who are "always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth." (2 Timothy 2:7)
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
New morality, same results
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Do we need a "Day of Prayer" to pray?
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Beware religious scams
Friday, March 5, 2010
What makes us happy?
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Are we headed "full circle?"
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Real men...
Every weekend of the Fall season, football fans get to watch their favorite gridiron gladiators battle for pigskin supremacy; or at least "show up" and do their very best against the opponent. Win or lose, every fan expects an all-out effort, to “leave it all on the field.” And even beyond the sports venue, this kind of effort and willingness to face up to any opponent, challenge or adversary is a key part of what most regard as “manliness”.
What it comes down to in practical terms is the "warrior" attitude that seeks to exert power, win the day, to remain un-bowed before whoever or whatever is confronting us in our quest for high-value objectives. There's a place for bravery and steadfast courage, but it gets easily confused in the human mind with raw power, especially the kind that's used for personal benefit.
So, when Paul tells the Church to “Stand firm in the faith, act like men, be strong” (1 Corinthians 16:13), it might be natural for modern minds to think of this in similar terms to what we expect in sports, business or war. The modern stereotype of a man includes things like aggression, bravery and a willingness to stand up to any opponent. Most boys play some form of “King of the hill,” and take this assertive, power-play mentality into their grown-up life. Those who can’t or won’t are often branded with some kind of negative label, like “wimp”, “cupcake” or “momma’s boy”.
This might explain a lot of unnecessary conflicts that spoil relationships in the home, the church and the workplace. When maturity is confused with power and conquest, people see competition instead of partnership, and humility is labeled as weakness.
But such images and expectations come into direct conflict with the example of Jesus Christ, who openly and unapologetically declared, “I am gentle and humble in heart” (Matthew 11:29). I don’t think anyone who knew Jesus of Nazareth would have thought of Him as a “wimp”, or one who would back down from a confrontation with evil. The difference is that He stood up for God’s rights, not for His own. He bravely faced the cross without a hint of self-pity or reluctance, but stood silent before the accusations of Jerusalem’s leaders.
The “power-play” kind of manliness accounts for a great many church splits, many broken homes and other impaired relationships, and stands in stark contrast to the Bible’s image of “acting like men” (or mature women for that matter). Paul puts the whole matter of real maturity and strength into perspective, as he concludes his short exhortation in saying, “Let all that you do be done in love” (1 Corinthians 16:14). Real men know how to live with real love, just like the greatest Man who loved the world in the greatest way, when He went boldly and powerfully to the cross for sinful mankind.